Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Lesson 6: Zephaniah and Nahum



Lesson Six: February 18, 2014


Isaiah 10-23 is mostly from this period and II Kings 19:9-35 and 20:1-11

Manasseh, 687-642
II Kings 21:1-18

Amon 642-640
II Kings 21:19-26

Josiah 640-609
II Kings 22:1-23:30 & II Chronicles 34-35
The book of Deuteronomy was the basis of the religious reform during this time.
Parts of Jeremiah

(4) Zephaniah (636-609, 3 Chapters)

Zephaniah and the Philosophical Context

During the reign of Josiah, the prophet Zephaniah, the great-great grandson of Hezekiah, offered his words in 632-621. Achtemeier thinks Chapters 1-2 show a period shortly after 640 BC, while 3:1-17 show a period between 612-609, and 3:18-20 reflect the Deuteronomic Historian.
The prophet was the great-great grandson of Hezekiah, king of Judah. Some people think that from a linguistic analysis all of the minor prophets were written at about the same time, between 630 and 520 BC, but set within certain times. Ben Zvi is a particular proponent of this position.   
His concern was for the immediate Scythian invasion as it affected Assyria in 632 BC, as well as the threat of Assyria itself.  Herodotus says Scythians were wild and ferocious marauders from the Asian interior. Medes and Assyrians were having trouble with them.
Klaus Koch summarizes that the prophet believes Judah is going to be devastated.  Yet, beyond that, he sees hope for the people who survive the coming destruction.  He proclaimed the downfall of Nineveh, which would come because of the city's pride. Koch also thinks that he may have had some influence on the reform initiated by Josiah and the Deuteronomic writings.
Watts will say that the prophet will be against foreign alliances and the worship of false gods. He believed pride was the greatest sin.
Adele Berlin (AB, 1994) says that Zephaniah shares with many other prophetic writings an overall structure of chastisement followed by comfort -- or, as modern studies often see it, a tripartite structure of judgment against Judah, judgment against the foreign nations, and a message of hope. She says it contains an elevated rhetorical style.  It is not a formally metrical one, but does contain many poetic tropes and the rhythm that comes from the repetition of phrases and from parallelism. She describes it as a highly literate work; it shares ideas and phraseology with other parts of the Hebrew Bible to such an extent that at times it may appear as nothing more than a appropriation of borrowed verses and allusions.  Themes from the early chapters of Genesis appear in all three Chapters of Zephaniah.  For example, Chapter 1 begins with a description that is a reversal of creation.  Chapter 2 plays on the view of the world in Genesis 10.  Chapter 3 contains a reference to Genesis 11, and becomes oracles against Jerusalem. In addition, one finds a number of links between the prophet and the writings of the Deuteronomic Historian. Zephaniah reflects the cultural milieu of the period from Hezekiah to Josiah. It pictures an expanded, wealthy Jerusalem.  Like the writings of the Deuteronomic History, Zephaniah is strongly anti-syncretistic.  The language of Zephaniah is closest to that of Jeremiah and Ezekiel. One can see a funeral dirge for Jerusalem in 3:1-4.  One can see the influence of Isaiah in 3:2 and 3:11, compare 2:15.
She will also urge us to adopt a “literary” approach to the text, rather than try to discover the original context of particular oracles. That will be the approach here.
Zephaniah 1:1 is the title. The book is the word of the Lord to Zephaniah, who was the great-grandson of Hezekiah. His father was “Cushi,” the word meaning the region of Ethiopia. It may suggest an African heritage, according to Watts. This word came when Josiah was king of Judah. The name means, “The Lord Protects.”
Zephaniah 1:2-2:3 has the theme of the Day of the Lord for Judah, reflecting the period 636-626. Achtemeier says we have here the major theme of the whole book. The origin was the tribal federation holy wars, with the Lord as divine warrior leading the armies of Israel. As with Amos, however, the prophets said that the war of the Lord could turn back upon Israel. The focus is not so much a time but an event. The image of that event is the wrath of God against wickedness. God is the warrior who engages in battles, weakening and destroying enemies. Wealth cannot save enemies. The event destroys human pride. Yet, the Lord may redeem a remnant.
Zephaniah 1: 2-6 discuss the divine judgment on worship of false gods. In a statement that sounds like the flood of Genesis, the Lord will sweep away everything: humans, animals, birds, and fish. Achtemeier says that we have here a radical picture of the wrath of God burning up a creation gone wrong. To refer to “sweeping clean” in this way, Watts suggests, offers a negative interpretation of the autumn harvest festival. The Lord will make the wicked stumble. The Lord will cut humanity from the earth. The Lord will stretch out a hand against Judah and Jerusalem. The Lord will cut off every remnant of Baal and idolatrous priests and those who bow to the hosts of heaven on their housetops, who swear or make an oath as part of their worship to the Lord, but also to Milcom, the astral deity of Ammon. The priests broke the first commandment. Such persons do not follow, seek, or inquire of the Lord. Achtemeier says the sins listed are idolatry, syncretism, and indifference toward God. She says the reigns of Mannasseh and Amnon have taken their toll. The problem for the prophet is that Judeans saw no harm in this. The Lord was just another god. Such an opening seems to move against the promise contained in the conclusion of the flood story in Genesis.
the Lord said in his heart, "I will never again curse the ground because of humankind, for the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth; nor will I ever again destroy every living creature as I have done. Genesis 8:21

In Zephaniah 1:7-9, the prophet addresses courtiers. The prophet urges people to be silent, for the day of the Lord is at hand. The lord has prepared a sacrifice and has consecrated the guests. Watts says this language is that of a holy war in which God participates in the battle. On the day of the sacrifice of the Lord, the Lord will punish officials, the sons of the king and all who dress in foreign attire. Achtemeier says it refers to the sacrifice one offered before going into battle. The Lord will punish all who leap over the threshold, which Watts says refers to the elevated platform on which the inner temple building was built. The sin, to him, is climbing up to the holy of holies. The Lord will punish those who fill the house of the master with violence and fraud. Achtemeier wants to stress the reasons for the judgment of God on Judah, for they accepted Assyrian ways, including idolatry, and left the demands of the covenant. She believes, however, that they had to compromise at some level.
Zephaniah 1:10-11 is an oracle against the merchants of Jerusalem. Watts says the form of this oracle is that of a lament.  On that day, one will hear a cry from the Fish Gate, a wail from the Second Quarter, and a loud crash from the hills. Watts says the places may be at the north side from which an attack would come. The inhabitants of the Mortar wail, for traders have perished. The Lord cuts off all who weigh silver. Watts thinks it refers to merchants who have profited from the sale of cult objects.
Zephaniah 1:12-13 is an oracle against unbelievers. “At that time” the Lord will search Jerusalem with lamps and punish people who rest complacently on their dregs, a reference to drunkenness, and say in their hearts that the Lord not do good or harm, a reference to unbelief. Achtemeier says the proverb here reveals that the people of Jerusalem no longer believe God is governor of the world. The Day of the lord will reveal who really rules the earth. Pannenberg[1] notes that to perceive the acts of preservation and judgment from God in history, we simply need a readiness to reckon concretely with God as the Lord of history, in distinction from those who with a false security say mockingly that God does neither good nor evil. The Lord will plunder their wealth and lay waste their homes. They will build houses, but not inhabit them. They will plant vineyards, but they shall not drink the wine from them. We find a similar punishment in Deuteronomy.
You shall build a house, but not live in it. You shall plant a vineyard, but not enjoy its fruit. (Deuteronomy 28:30)
You shall plant vineyards and dress them, but you shall neither drink the wine nor gather the grapes, for the worm shall eat them. (Deuteronomy 28:39)

Achtemeier points out that judgment will begin at the commercial center of Jerusalem.
            Zephaniah 1:14-18 is an oracle concerning the Day of the Lord. Watts stresses that the day is one of battle and the appearance of the Lord on the battlefield decides the outcome. Achtemeier stresses that the prophet begins with a holy war by God against the people. The great day is near, the sound is bitter. It will be a day of wrath, distress, anguish, rain, devastation, darkness, gloom, clouds, thick darkness, trumpet blast, and battle cry against fortified cities. Achtemeier will say that the darkness is symbolic of the overwhelming presence of God, even as at Sinai. Now, however, the purpose is judgment. No defense will be adequate. The Lord will bring such distress upon people that they shall walk like the blind. The reason is that they have sinned against the Lord. The Lord will pour out their blood like dust and their flesh like dung. Neither silver nor gold will save them on the day of the wrath of the Lord. The fire of the passion of the Lord will consume the earth, for the inhabitants of the earth will have a full, terrible end. Achtemeier wants to stress that  the sin the Lord is attacking is to live life without God.
            Zephaniah 2:1-3 is a conclusion to the first segment, a call to conversion. Before the day comes, the prophet offers a call to repent. The call is to gather a shameless nation. Achtemeier says the prophet is calling for a public assembly of prayer and fasting. The call is emphatic. The assembly must come before the Lord drives them away like the drifting chaff, before the fierce anger of the Lord comes upon them, and before the day of the wrath of the Lord comes. The call is for the humble of the land to seek the Lord, that is, those dependent upon the Lord. The call is for those who do the commands, seek righteousness, and seek humility. Achtemeier stresses that such people will fulfill the covenant relationship. If they do, the Lord might hide them from the day of the wrath of the Lord. Watts stresses that the proper response to the announcement of doom is not to flee, but to turn to God. Yet, the prophet offers only the possibility of protection through conversion, but not a promise of it. Achtemeier says people are not judging their actions in the light of the will of God.
            Zephaniah 2:4-15 is the third segment, given in 636-626, having the theme of oracles against the nations. Achtemeier says the reason for the judgment in these oracles is pride. She notes that usually in the Old Testament, the nations come to Jerusalem.
            Zephaniah 4-7 are against Philistia. This country was along the coast to the west of Jerusalem. Some of the earliest battles of the Israelites were against them, as we see in Numbers 21-24. The prophet declares that Gaza and Ashkelon shall experience desolation, the people of Ashdod and Ekron uprooted. The word of the Lord is against the land of the Philistines, destroying them. The Lord shall destroy the inhabitants of the seacoast. The seacoast shall become home for a remnant or the survivors from the house of Judah.
            Zephaniah 8-11 are against Moab and Ammon. These countries are east of Jordan. The Lord has heard the taunts from Moab and Ammon. They shall become like Sodom and Gomorrah, a land of nettles and salt pits, a wasteland forever. The remnant of Judah shall plunder them. Their pride caused them to boast against the people of the Lord of hosts. The Lord will be terrible against them and their gods shall shrivel. Each of the nations shall bow to the Lord. Watts says the point here is that after the day of the Lord survivors will continue. The plundering suggests the people of God will participate in the fruits of victory. The Lord will restore the fortunes of Judah. The nations are against the Lord because they are against Israel. Achtemeier thinks the point of the remnant and survivors is that the meek shall inherit the earth.
            Zephaniah 2:12 is against Ethiopia. The sword shall kill this nation. Watts says that in 663 Assyria ended the rule of Ethiopia in Egypt. He thinks of this as recent history for Zephaniah.
            Zephaniah 2:13-15 is against Assyria. The judgment of the nations turns north. The Lord will stretch out a hand against Assyria and make Nineveh desolate. It will become like a desert. Herds, wild animal, the desert owl, the screech owl, the raven, all shall make their home there. “Is this the exultant city that lived secure, that said to itself, ‘I am, and there is no one else?’” Watts will stress that arrogance is the reason for judgment. We see similar phrasing of this type of pride in a later reflection by another prophet.
Now therefore hear this, you lover of pleasures,
who sit securely, who say in your heart,
"I am, and there is no one besides me;
I shall not sit as a widow or know the loss of children" (Isaiah 47:8)

You felt secure in your wickedness;
you said, "No one sees me."
Your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray,
and you said in your heart, "I am, and there is no one besides me." (Isaiah 47:10)

Yet, it has become a home for wild animals. People who pass by will hiss and shake their fists at it. The city was destroyed in 612. Achtemeier stresses here that no God can let this sin go unpunished.
            The fourth section is Zephaniah 3:1-8, oracles against Jerusalem and Judah, proclaimed in 612-609. In essence, Judah becomes part of the nations deserving of judgment from the Lord. Amos 2 follows a similar pattern. For Achtemeier, it has become clear that the reform initiated by Josiah and symbolized by the Deuteronomic Historian, will not bear fruit. She also sees many parallels with Jeremiah, suggesting common rhetoric among those who supported reform. In contrast, however, 3:1-4 has a structural relationship to 2:15, reminding Judah that it will not escape judgment. Verses 1-5 are against Jerusalem. One can find similar words about Jerusalem in Isaiah 1:21-23, offered around 733-727. The prophet pronounces a “woe” upon a soiled, defiled oppressing city. It has listened to no voice and accepted no correction. It has not trusted in the Lord. It has not drawn near to God. Watts stresses that because the city had no strong connection to the Lord moral chaos, oppression, and false religion are the result. Officials are roaring lions and wolves, Watts saying this means that leaders looked upon the people as objects of prey. Its prophets are reckless and faithless. Its priests profane the sacred and done violence to the law. Jeremiah 8:10, a prophecy from around the same years, offers a similar condemnation. Of course, Watts points out, priests were to take care of sacred objects and instruct in the Torah. They did neither. The Lord within it is righteous. The Lord does no wrong. The Lord renders judgment each morning, but the unjust knows no shame. The Lord has cut off nations. The Lord has laid them waste and made them desolate. They have no inhabitants. The Lord said, “Surely the city will fear me, it will accept correction, it will not lose sight of all that I have brought upon it.” Judah resisted this “wish” of the Lord. Yet, they increased their corruption. Therefore, wait for the day the Lord arises as a witness. Achtemeier will stress that Judah had the witness of prophets, covenant law, the consistence of nature, and the judgment of the nations. Yet, Judah rejects the witnesses. The decision of the Lord is to gather nations and pour out indignation and “all the heat” of the anger of the Lord, “for in the fire of my passion” the Lord shall consume the earth. We find here the universal judgment of the Lord. The fall of great empires is the action of God.
            The fifth section is Zephaniah 3:9-18a, with the theme of promises. Verses 9-10 focus on the nations. Watts observes that we see here the prophetic pattern of judgment preceding the merciful action of God. He will say that the change is abrupt. The Lord will change the speech of the peoples so that they will call upon the Lord and serve the Lord “with one accord.” We find here that the new act of salvation from God will reverse what happened at the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11:1-9 (J, 900s). Because of that connection, it also connects with Acts 2 and the birth of the church. It refers to a common language and a common labor. The scattered ones who belong to the Lord will bring an offering from beyond the rivers of Ethiopia, suggesting the limits of the world as the prophet knew them. Watts points out the reference to the scattered ones of the Lord could refer to the scattered peoples of the earth. He says that we have here the reign of God on earth becoming a reality. Achtemeier will stress that the prophet moves to the transforming action of God to create a new people. The word of God has the goal of life, not death. Verses 11-13 refer to the humble remnant of Israel. On that day, Judah shall not have shame because of their rebellion against the Lord and their lack of repentance, for the Lord will remove the pride that led to judgment. The Lord will leave among them a humble and lowly people who shall seek refuge in the name of the Lord. This will be the remnant of Israel. Watts will stress that the Lord had long been forming a people, and will finally become reality from among the poor and helpless. They take refuge in the only they could at this point. They shall do no wrong, not lie, and not deceive. Further, “they will pasture and lie down, and no one shall make them afraid.” Given the universal vision just presented, Israel can be whole. Watts stresses that we have here the peace given to those who survive the holocaust described in the previous segments. Achtemeier says the people will have a new character. The prophets say a close connection between what one worshiped and what one did ethically. New character will arise because of faithful living within the community.
            Zephaniah 3:14-18a is a psalm of joy in Zion. The daughter Zion (also called Israel and Jerusalem) is to sing and shout, rejoicing with all its heart. “Daughter Zion” is a sign of the affection with which the prophet thinks of Jerusalem. Singing was integral worship in Israel as well as its normal life. Singing was largely reserved for joyful occasions, while laments were for mourning, as we saw earlier in the book with the call to wail or cry. The Lord has taken away the judgments against them and turned their enemies away. Significantly, the king of Israel, the Lord, is in their midst, so they shall fear disaster no more. A debased monarchy remained a favorite object of prophetic denunciation. From the prophetic perspective, Israel abandoned its true king, The statement also reflects the theology of Jerusalem’s ultimate inviolability, which developed from the temple theology that emerged soon after the Israelite settlement in Canaan. Because the Ark of the Covenant resided in the temple in Jerusalem (having been brought there from Shiloh by David), the temple was understood to be the earthly dwelling place of Israel’s patron deity, whose dwelling could never be destroyed by enemies. With the destruction first of Shiloh and later of Jerusalem, this theology was undermined at the literal level (see, e.g., Jeremiah 7:12, 14; 26:6), forcing a recasting of it in eschatological terms. On that day, the Lord will say to Jerusalem not to fear or let their hands grow weak. The Lord is the warrior in their midst who gives them victory. The Lord will rejoice over them with gladness and renew them in love. The Lord will exult over them with the singing as on a day of a festival. God dwells as king among them. That has been question throughout this prophecy. Who will rule the life of Judah? The King of the universe is the King of love, whose will is to save.  The pictures of that day are interesting: The people are having a carnival.  God is present celebrating as well, a shepherd calling out to friends and neighbors that the lost sheep have been recovered.
Zephaniah 3:18-20 is a brief addition to this prophet from this period, reflecting common themes of prophetic eschatology. It seems based on the prophecies of III Isaiah. The promise is that the Lord will remove disaster from Judah so that they will not bear reproach for it. Some think that this could refer to the apostates in 1:5-6. The Lord will deal with all their oppressors at that time, referring to the final defeat of their enemies. In referring to the exiles, this addition says that the Lord will save the lame and gather the outcast. The Lord will change shame into praise and renown in all the earth. At that time, the Lord will bring them home, gather them, and make them renowned and praised among the peoples of the earth. The Lord will restore their fortunes before their eyes. If this passage is part of Zephaniah, it could refer to those of the Assyrian exile. The prophet refers to the restoration of a secure and bountiful homeland and the exaltation of Israel among the nations. The scattered people will see the victory of God and participate in it. This beatific vision of the end of the present world will persist in remarkably intact form, through the rest of the Jewish and Christian canons and even into contemporary theology. The notion of the homeland in this passage will become the wellspring of the anguished politics of the modern Middle East.

(5) Nahum (614-612, 3 Chapters)

Nahum and the Philosophical Context

            Nahum (a name meaning “comfort”) prophesied in 612, proclaiming the downfall of Nineveh, and the first prophet inspired by its fall. Watts says the last of the great Assyrian emperors died in 626. The enemies of Assyria formed against it in 614. According to Achtemeier, Nineveh fell in August of 612. He offers an oracle against Assyria in a way that Klaus Koch says is more passionate than that of Zephaniah. He offers an interpretation of these events. As Watts sees it, the decline of Assyria allowed Josiah to carry out his reforms. Von Rad says the book has no oracle against Judah because the reforms by Josiah were ongoing. Koch will say that the king of Assyria is the embodiment of wickedness in Nahum. He captures the mood of joy and satisfaction at this manifestation of the Lord as the avenger of wrong. He expresses a belief in the future of Judah as filled with promise. It appears that the reforms instituted by Josiah were the reasons for this hopefulness. Of course, the joy would have a short life, for in 609, Pharaoh Necho will defeat and kill Josiah. Egypt will dominate the country until 605, when it will experience defeat by the Babylonians. Within the prophetic tradition, one sees some tension regarding Assyria, for Jonah will have a quite different perspective than that which Nahum presents here. Simon J. DeVires[2] thought the liturgy in Jerusalem for the short period of 612-609 as a likely use of the book, especially given some hymn additions to the book. He also thought Nahum was a Yahwist and nationalist. He might have some knowledge of Isaiah in 10:12-13 in that Assyria had limits to its power.  Achtemeier notes that lectionary readings do not come from this book, suggesting that people read it as a nationalistic and vengeful work. Yet, she also notes the language is powerful. For her, the book is about God, not human beings. She opines that God is more forgiving of Assyria than pictured here, referring to Jonah as an example. The combination of Scythian, Medes, and Babylonians brought the defeat of Nineveh.
            The first segment, Nahum 1:1, is the title. It describes itself as an oracle that arises from the vision given to Nahum of Elkosh, a place otherwise unknown.
            The second segment, Nahum 1:2-15, has the theme of the anger of the Lord against Nineveh. The point is the Lord will eliminate all that is harmful, with this poem reflecting that faith. The Lord is jealous, avenging, and wrathful, taking vengeance on adversaries. God will not tolerate opposition. Achtemeier thinks of God as jealous as creating a people of God. She will also opine that if God does not destroy the evil of human beings, then the world will never experience the wholeness God intended. She also stresses that God, and not human vengeance, will destroy wrong. “The Lord is slow to anger but great in power, and the Lord will be no means clear the guilty.” We find here another expression of the goodness of the Lord, illustrated the long period in which Assyria ruled. Achtemeier notes that Assyrian documents betray great pride. Her point is that God gives people time to turn their lives. However, the patience of the Lord is due to lack of divine power. Yet, as she points out, while God forgives, the wrath of God is another option. Since God will not clear the guilty, God will destroy Assyria. The way of the Lord is that of whirlwind and storm. The Lord dries up the sea and rivers, the Lord taking up action against the seas. We should note that the seas were also a powerful symbol of evil and chaos. The Lord reduces its power. Bashan, Carmel, and Lebanon wither. Mountains quake, hills melt, and the earth heaves, “the world and all who live in it.” Who can stand before the indignation and anger of the Lord. The anger of the Lord pours out like fire and breaks the rocks. “The Lord is good, a stronghold in a day of trouble.” The Lord protects those who take refuge in the Lord, even in a flood. The Lord will bring adversaries to an end. He wonders why they plot against the Lord, for the Lord will make an end of them. Enemies become entangled and drunk, consumed like dry straw. Yet, one has gone out who plots evil against the Lord and counsels wickedness.
5 Ah, Assyria, the rod of my anger—
 the club in their hands is my fury! 
6 Against a godless nation I send him,
and against the people of my wrath I command him,
to take spoil and seize plunder,
and to tread them down like the mire of the streets. (Isaiah 10:5-6)
13 For he says:
"By the strength of my hand I have done it,
and by my wisdom, for I have understanding;
I have removed the boundaries of peoples,
and have plundered their treasures;
like a bull I have brought down those who sat on thrones. 
14 My hand has found, like a nest, the wealth of the peoples;
and as one gathers eggs that have been forsaken,
so I have gathered all the earth;
and there was none that moved a wing,
or opened its mouth, or chirped." 
15 Shall the ax vaunt itself over the one who wields it,
or the saw magnify itself against the one who handles it?
As if a rod should raise the one who lifts it up,
or as if a staff should lift the one who is not wood! (Isaiah 10:13-15)
18 Do not let Hezekiah mislead you by saying, The Lord will save us. Has any of the gods of the nations saved their land out of the hand of the king of Assyria?  19 Where are the gods of Hamath and Arpad? Where are the gods of Sepharvaim? Have they delivered Samaria out of my hand?  20 Who among all the gods of these countries have saved their countries out of my hand, that the Lord should save Jerusalem out of my hand?' " (Isaiah 36:18-20)

Yet, the Lord says that though they are at full strength and numerous, the Lord will cut them off. Given the destruction of such evil, Nahum offers an urgent call to Judah to repent today. Though the Lord has afflicted Judah, the Lord will afflict no more. Now, the Lord will break of the yoke from Judah. The Lord will not perpetuate its name any longer, making their grave, for they are worthless. “Look! On the mountains the feet of on who brings good tidings, who proclaims peace!” Watts refers to the joyful expectation that the good news is coming soon over the roads. The Lord wants Judah to celebrate its festivals and fulfill their vows, for never again will he wicked invade them.
            The third segment, Nahum 2:1-13, has the theme that Nineveh is to fall. It describes the concluding battle. Achtemeier contrasts Judah of 1:12-15 and Assyria in Chapter 2. Diodorus (21 BC) says there was an ancient prophecy that the city would not be taken unless the river became its enemy.  That happened as the Euphrates flooded the city and took down its walls. One who shatters has come against the city. They are to watch ramparts and roads and gird loins. They are to collect their strength. As an aside, the Lord is restoring the majesty of Jacob and Israel, even though ravagers have come. The shields of the warriors are red and the soldiers clothed in crimson. He refers to chariots and prancing chargers. The chariots race through the streets. “He calls his officers; they stumble as they come forward.” Watts says this may refer to over-eagerness of the attack. They come to the wall. The river gates open and the palace trembles. Watts says the description of the battle may be accurate. The outer defenses fall and the struggle continues in the alleys. It may suggest the indirect attack of flooding waters in the city. Exile has come upon the city by divine decree. The captors will carry slave women away. Nineveh, the first mention of the city, is like a pool whose waters run away. Here is the goal of the assault. The call is to plunder the silver, gold, and plunder. Devastation and destruction have come. Watts stresses its power and glory are gone. Hearts faint and knees tremble. What became of the den of the lion? The lion has torn enough, filling caves with prey. The Lord of hosts against Assyria and will burn their chariots, the sword devouring their young lions. The Lord will cut off their prey from the earth and no one shall hear the voice of messengers no more.  The hold Assyria had on the area is over.
            The fourth segment, Nahum 3:1-19, has the theme of a woe to Nineveh. Throughout the passage the female reference to the city dominates, possibly because the goddess Ishtar was the patron of the city. She had sacred prostitutes. The city is full of bloodshed, deceit, and plunder. Clearly, Watts says, the city deserves the punishment she receives. He refers to the crack of whip, the rumble of wheel, the galloping horse, and bounding chariot. He refers to horsemen charging with the flashing sword and spear. He refers to piles of dead without end, to the point of stumbling over the bodies. He refers to the countless debaucheries of the prostitute, who was alluring, a mistress of sorcery, one who enslaves nations. The Lord is against the city, and the Lord will lift up its skirts over the face. The Lord will let the nations look upon the nakedness of the city. Watts stresses that the city tempted all who came into contact with her. The Lord will throw filth at it, and treat it with contempt. All who see the city will shrink from the city, “Nineveh is devastated; who will bemoan here?” Who shall give comfort?  No one will express sympathy. The prophet now goes on to the lesson of Thebes, which Assyria defeated in 663 BC. Is the city better than Thebes? He refers to Ethiopia, Egypt, Put, and Libya as being helpers of Thebes. Yet, she went into captivity, its infants dashed in pieces. Achtemeier refers to Pritchard, p. 295 for a description of the defeat of Thebes. The point is that human might is nothing before the wrath of God. Nineveh relies on its own power. The enemy bound its dignitaries. Next, the prophet makes it clear that any preparations by Nineveh will be useless. The strength of the city has become its weakness. “You will also be drunken,” and go into hiding, seeking refuge from the enemy. Fortresses are like fig trees, if shaken, they all into the mouth of the eater. The troops are like women. The gates of the land are open to their foes. Fire has devoured the bars of the gates. Draw water for the siege and strengthen the forts. Trample the clay, tread the mortar, and take hold of the brick mold. The fire will devour the city; the sword will cut it off. The prophet compares Assyria to burned up locusts. Thus, the fire will devour them like the locust. They increased their merchants. The locust sheds its skin and flies away. Their guards are like grasshoppers and scribes like swarms of locusts settling on the fences on a cold day. When the sun raises, they fly away. The prophet now turns to lament. No one knows where they have gone. The shepherds are asleep, “O king of Assyria,” and nobles slumber. The people scatter on the mountains with no one to gather them. Achtemeier says Nahum likes to dwell on the worldly possessions of Assyria. There is no assuaging your hurt, for the wound is mortal. All who hear the news about you clap their hands. For who has ever escaped your endless cruelty? Achtemeier quotes: “Free at last, free at last. Thank God Almighty. Free at least!” Her point is that celebration over the defeat of evil is legitimate. She wants the faithful to ask if they have participated in such corruption. Further, she will stress that this little book is a celebration of divine action.







[1] Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 498.
[2] (Interpreter’s Bible)

Lesson Five: Hosea Part Two

Chapters 4-7 are oracles on the state of the nation. Hosea lists wrongdoings and threatens appropriate punishments. 
            Sins of the Priest:        Rejected knowledge of God
                                                Has forgotten the Torah
                                                Inquires his staff and stick
                                                Wine and must have captured the people
                                                He will stumble
                                                He will be removed from priesthood
                                                His mother will be ruined
            Sins of the People:      Related to decalogue
                                                Lack knowledge and Torah
                                                Sacrifices and Incense
                                                Hill shrines
                                                Mizpah and Tabor
                                                Inquiry of idols
                                                Sexual cult activities

In 4:1-19 we find the covenant lawsuit, in which the lord employs courtroom language to charge Israel with violation of its covenant. We find a typical refrain of this section, where the indictment by the Lord finds no loyalty, faithfulness, or knowledge of God. Swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and adultery are common. The people mourn and languish, as do animals. Yet, the priests do not contend or accuse. They shall stumble, along with the prophet. The Lord will destroy the mother. In 4:6, “my people” perish for lack of knowledge and they have rejected knowledge. Therefore, the Lord rejects the priest, since he has forgotten the law. The Lord shall forget their children. They increased and sinned, changing their glory to shame. They feed on the sin of the people. The Lord will punish people and priest by repaying them for their deeds. They have forsaken the Lord and devoted themselves to whoredom. Wine has taken away their understanding. The people of the lord consult a piece of wood and divining rod. A spirit of whoredom has led them astray, forsaking the Lord. They sacrifice on the tops of mountains, under oak, poplar, and terebinth. Their daughters are whores and adulterers. A people without understanding come to ruin. Israel is the whore in a stubborn way, so the Lord cannot now feed them. The prophet condemns the sanctuaries of Gilgal and Bethel (hose of bread), the latter with a sarcastic reference to Bethaven (house of falsehood). Ephraim has joined itself to idols, so the Lord leaves them alone. When drinking is over, they have sexual orgies, loving lewdness more than their glory. 5:1 begins with an appeal to priest, house of Israel, and king to listen. The Lord knows Ephraim, as it played the whore. Their deeds do not permit them to return to their God, for the spirit of whoredom is within them. In 5:4, they cannot return to “their God” because “they do not know the Lord.” The pride of Israel testifies against Ephraim, but Judah stumbles as well. They shall seek the Lord with their flocks and herds, but they shall not find the Lord, for the Lord has withdrawn. In 5: 8-11, we have discussion of the politics of the nation. This text is not as coherent as others are.  There is a series of accusations and corresponding threats.  The historical situation is a conflict between Israel and Judah and both appeal to Assyria for help.  Alt (1919) believed one could place 5:8-6:6 into II Kings 16 and Isaiah 7.  He did many emendations to Hosea.  To oppose this, Good (1966) showed a liturgical background.  There is an autumn festival, covenant lawsuit, theophany, and an oracle that are part of cultic activity.  However, Alt has shown that one can best understand verses 8-15 as part of the Syro-Ephraimite war against Judah in 733, and thus with II Kings and Isaiah 7.  They can sound the horn in Gilgal, Ramah, and Bethaven, while Benjamin looks behind it. Ephraim shall be desolate. The princes of Judah are like those who remove the landmark. The Lord shall pour out wrath upon them. Ephraim experiences oppression because it was vain. The prophet knew the folly of an alliance with Assyria.  Judah has moved boundaries suggesting an attack on Israel.  Israel's sin is idolatry.  The text begins with Judah's war cry; Judah is the aggressor.  However, it is just because of Israel’s idolatry.  Although Judah is the agent of God's punishment, that does not make Judah right. In 5:12-6:6, we find the climax in 6:1-3, flanked by two balancing passages.  However, Yahweh is committed to the covenant.  The blessings and cursings work in two contradictory ways of destruction and re-creation.  Hosea's solution to Yahweh's problem of the covenant is that guilty Israel will be executed by Israel will be reconstituted through resurrection.  Note sickness & healing / death & resurrection.  They have been faithless with the Lord, having illegitimate children. The Lord is like maggots to Ephraim and like rottenness to the house of Judah. When Israel and Judah saw their sickness, they went to Assyria and the great king. However, that king will not cure or heal. The Lord will be like a lion to Ephraim and Judah. The Lord will turn away until they acknowledge their guilt. In 6: 1-3, we find the repentance of Israel. It is a speech by the people.  Of 22 words in the Hebrew text, 12 are verbs.  There is suspense.  Yahweh has punished the people. Yahweh is waiting for them to repent.  The response of these verses is still a possibility.  If they make this confession, then the Lord will bless.  6:1 begins with a call to return to the Lord, for the Lord is the one who will heal them. The Lord has struck down, and the Lord will bind us up. The fact that Yahweh had ripped them is not a reason for returning.  The text refers to what will happen after the restoration of Israel.  Yahweh has inflicted fatal injury.  In 6:2, “on the third day he will raise us up / that we may live before him,” may be the basis in the New Testament of the notion of Jesus rising “on the third day.” We find a clear reference to resurrection.  2 and 3 days may reflect a belief that here was a three-day period before soul and body separated.  The resurrection theme is comparable to Ezekiel 37.  Previous scholars believed that resurrection so early in Israel's history would not be likely.  However, more research that is recent has confirmed it to be possible. The prophet encourages them to press on to know the Lord, whose appearing is as sure as the dawn, for the Lord will come to us like the showers and spring rain. In 6: 4-6, we find the sentence of Yahweh.   Then a heartfelt appeal from the Lord, as the Lord wonders what I do with Ephraim or Judah. Ephraim and Judah are on the same footing.  Note the agony of indecision here and in 11:8.  The people have been ruined and Yahweh is waiting for them to repent.  Their love is like a morning cloud and dew that goes away early. The only accusation made is a failure of hesed.  In verse 5, prophets referred to are probably Moses and Samuel.  Therefore, the Lord has judged them Instead of responding to 6:1-3, the text is a continuation of 5:12-15 and its mood.  There is no hint that Yahweh will respond positively to the people's speech in 6:1-3.  Verse 6 is the rhetorical climax and as such is the final truth.  Note the prophet does not reject sacrifice, but rather puts it in second place.  Hosea probably has a text like I Sam 15:22-25.  There is not a strong affirmation here of what Yahweh will do.  There are no predictions.  Who knows whether the people will repent? The Lord desires steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings. Pannenberg[1] notes that the prophet can state a principle critical of the tradition here, which is similar to Jesus making the two great commandments a critical principle of Jewish Law. 6:7-7:2 relates the crimes of the priests. It resumes the theme of the sins of the priesthood. Hosea charges them with public crimes of robbery and murder. However, 10:11 implicates the whole nation. 6:7-7:7 may refer to the transition between Jeroboam II and Menahem. The text is a tirade against all kinds of wickedness. Thus, at Adam they transgressed the covenant. Gilead is a city of evildoers. Priests are like robbers, with murders on the road to Shechem. The Lord has seen a horrible thing, with the whoredom of Ephraim. [Yet, Judah will also have a harvest with the Lord restores the fortunes of the people.] making a brief positive note that is not connected to the context. The Lord will heal Israel with the revelation of the corruption of Ephraim. The prophet refers t the wicked deeds of Samaria in dealing falsely, thieves, and bandits. They do not consider that the Lord remembers their wickedness. 7:3-7 refers to domestic policies. The king is glad with their wickedness. They are adulterers. They are hot like ovens. The repentance seems to be the result of divine restoration. The generosity of the Lord, not severity, leads to repentance.  The group referred to is priests. They take malevolent action against the king.  It involves a drunken feast by the leaders at which an assassination takes place.  Note Isaiah 28, where the two prophets may be referring to the same event.  The lying and princes are targets of the assault.  Is the baker a real person involved in the drama, or part of the oven imagery?  It seems as if the baker had the responsibility of staying awake and keeping watch.  That failure may have been intentional.  He may have been in league with the conspirators. In 7:8-16, we find a discussion of international politics. These verses deal with the entanglement of Israel in international politics. Scholars often view the passage as a collection of small, fragmentary oracles. Yet, one can note a continuity of theme in that of going to Assyria and Egypt.  Ephraim dominates the passage. Thus, Ephraim mixes himself with the peoples, like a cake not turned. Foreigners devour his strength but he seems to have no awareness of this. The pride of Israel testifies against Israel. Yet, they do not return to the Lord or seek the Lord. Ephraim is like a dove, silly and with no sense. They call upon Egypt and Assyria for help. In verse 11, Hosea emphasizes Israel's culpable ignorance.  The people have abandoned covenant knowledge and thereby perverted their knowledge of reality.  Because of theological error, they misjudged the political situation and have no self-knowledge.  To Hosea, this is a time of decision.  Egypt and Assyria are not yet directly involved.  He does not predict conquest, but he does foresee disaster if the present policy is continued.  In 7:12-15, we find Assyria and Yahweh's Sentence. God speaks here, Israel speaks in 6:1-3, and God speaks in 6:4-6.  Here, both states have the same faults and Yahweh deals with them in the same way.  Historically, Judah will survive after Assyria and, no hint of this in the text.  Only in 1:6-7 could one interpret that God will spare Judah, but that is an unlikely interpretation.  Everywhere else, Judah and Ephraim are together.  Note that a Judean editor would have had to go through drastic revision to bring the text in line with history.  The Lord will cast a net over them and bring them down, a probable reference to captivity. The Lord will discipline them. Woe to them, for they have strayed from the Lord, suggesting homeless wanderers. There is no substitute for security of life with Yahweh.  They have rebelled. The Lord wants to redeem them, but they speak lies against the Lord. They do not cry to the Lord from the heart. The Lord trained and strengthened their arms and plotted against God. The purpose of the punishment is not to destroy, but to bring repentance. By wandering away from security in Yahweh by following other gods meant, they would seek security in Egypt or Assyria.     
In 8:1-8, we find the calf of Samaria. The opening complaint is that the people have broken the covenant.  1) They have set up rulers Yahweh did not authorize.  2) They make idols.  3) They made treaties with Assyria/Egypt.  4) They built palaces and defense works.  This text is part of a larger discourse that includes 8-11. Yahweh gives the speech.  It views Israel from a distance.  Yahweh is deliberating what course of action to take.  The text gives no audience for the announcement.  It may be Hosea is simply reflecting on the consideration of the mind of Yahweh.  In verses 1-3, the people claim a special relation to Yahweh while breaking the covenant.  In verse 1, for their transgressions a foreign nation will attack them. The eagle is probably Yahweh.  Rebellion against Torah is rebellion against Yahweh's claims on Israel.  Pannenberg[2] will stress that all of the people of God are in a state of apostasy and revolt against their God. In verse 2, Israelites believed God was treating them special, thus guaranteeing their survival.  8th century prophets fought against this.  Here, the Israelites believe they know Yahweh.  This is self-deception and illusion.  In verses 4-6, "calf of Samaria" would be the bull images at Bethel and Dan.  The sin in v. 1-8 is making kings and making idols. 8:9-14 reflects upon alliances. The concern is with the political accusations of Ephraim with Assyria and Egypt.  It involved arrogant rejection of Yahweh's Torah, making forbidden covenants, payment of tribute and erecting sinful altars: The speaker is Yahweh.  The rulers of Israel are regarded as pagans.  They are ambassadors to Egypt and Assyria.  They make treaties and sacrifice to other gods.  Those actions bring the wrath of Yahweh. For verse 9, see II Ki 15:19-20, (743-738), 16:10-16 (after 733).  Ephraim has paid for the services of Assyria.  Yet, Ephraim was willing to sell itself to the highest bidder.  In verse 11, Hosea is probably not against the altars as such, but against their present use.  The sacrifices are contrary to Yahweh.  In verse 13, the reversal of Exodus is an appropriate punishment.  The prophet may have imagined Assyria and Egypt dividing is conquered Israel.  Historically, Egypt was less prominent in Israel's fate than Hosea suggests. However, verse 14, Barth[3] notes, focuses our attention on faith as a life lived in the presence of the Creator. In 9:1-9, we find desolation and prophecy. We can note the influence of Chapers 1-3. Hosea blames Israel for promiscuity. Illicit worship is competing with legitimate worship of Yahweh.  Indications are that worship is tied to agricultural life.  The theory of sexual services assisting their process is wrong and a theological disaster for Yahwism.  Baal was alluring because of the promise of fertility, so Yahweh condemns by making the harvest fail.  That is only temporary.  God will eventually eject them from the territory.  If they prefer the ways of the nations, then to the nations they should go.  Here, the focus is on Israel's rebellion in its religious practices rather than foreign alliances.  Note that the token of their rejection of Yahweh is their rejection of the prophet.  In verse 1, the cult references are to a pagan cult of Canaan, not Assyrian. They have played the whore, departing from your God, and have loved the pay of a prostitute. They shall not receive food and drink from normal sources. In verse 3, the people will no longer dwell in Yahweh's land, but in another, returning to Egypt and Assyria.  In verse 4, Israel will not worship the Lord either because the cult has been suspended or because the people have been excluded from it.  He might be referring to child sacrifice.  Their sacrifices shall not please the Lord. What shall they do on the festival days? Well, Egypt shall gather the fruits. Days of punishment have come, when Israel cries that the prophet is a fool and the man of the spirit is mad, a possible reference to a prophet of Baal.  See 4:5.  The prophet is a sentinel for God, yet a fowler’s snare is on the way. Yet, they have corrupted themselves as in the days of Gibeah, suggesting Israel is unchanged.  "Gibeah" see Judges 19:30.  The result was that one tribe was virtually eliminated. The Lord will remember this iniquity and sin. In 9:10-17, we have reference to Baal Peor and Gilgal. In Numbers 24, the evils at Baal-Peor are cultic and sexual.  The source of the cult is Moab and Midian.  In Ps 106:28 they ate human sacrifices.  Now the incident continued to trouble the national conscience.  In verse 10, we find a reference to wilderness.  Hosea is aware in other places of the patriarchal period. Israel was like grapes, the first fruit on the fig. They came to Baal-peor and consecrated themselves to a thing of shame and became detestable like the thing they loved. The glory of Ephraim shall fly away like a bird. Woe to them, for the Lord has departed. The Lord saw Ephraim as a young palm planted in a lovely meadow, but now, Ephraim leads his children to slaughter. Their evil began at Gilgal, where the Lord came to hate them due to their wickedness. The Lord will drive them out of “my house.” The Lord will love them no more, for their officials are rebels. Ephraim shall bear no fruit. They shall become wanderers among the nations. In 10:1-8, we find misattribution and misuse. Hosea further attacks the cult at Samaria and Bethel.  In verse 1, Israel is enriching Israel.  The text does not necessarily oppose opulent worship. Israel is a luxuriant vine, building more altars. Their hearts are false. They must bear their guilt. The Lord will break down their altars and destroy their pillars. In verse 3, we find they have made a radical renunciation of Yahweh.  They have rejected Yahweh as their king.  Leaders exerted pressure to accept Assyrian ways.  Canaanite cultic influences were strong.  In verse 4, another covenant replaces Yahweh's covenant.  Idolatrous priests shall wail over them. Ephraim shall be put to shame and Israel ashamed of its idol. In verse 8, we find the only reference to the high places.  Hosea condemns ceremonies performed on the mountains. In 10:9-15, we find reference to Gibeah and Beth Arbel. "Shalman" and "Beth Arbel" are places not locatable.  The simile is destruction on a massive scale.  "Days of Gibeah" refers to Judge 19:21.  Note the longing for national unity in spite of the division after Solomon's death.  He is concerned about the effects of civil war.  The years immediately following the death of Jeroboam II provide the background of civil war. They have sinned against the days of Gibeah. War shall overtake them. The lord will come against the wayward people to punish them. Ephraim was a trained heifer that loved to thresh. The Lord will make Ephraim break the ground, and Judah must plow.  In verse 12, we find a symbolic of life in the land characterized by righteousness and love.  They are to sow righteousness and reap steadfast love and break up their fallow ground, for the time has come to seek the Lord, that the Lord may come and rain righteousness upon them. To do these things is to seek Yahweh in repentance and dedication.  In verse 13, note the use of irony, for Israel was helpless before Assyria. They have plowed wickedness and reaped injustice, eating the fruit of lies. They have trusted in their power and warriors. The Lord shall destroy their fortresses. They great wickedness shall bring destruction. At dawn, the king of Israel shall be cut off.
In 11:1-12:1, we find a reference to childhood and consummation. In no other passage are the feelings of Yahweh more prominent.  The inner torment is more painful because of the conflicting demands of love.  Pannenberg[4] stresses the importance in the Old Testament of the filial relationship between Israel and the Lord, here designating the whole of the covenant people as the children of God. Hosea develops his metaphor of Yahweh and Israel as a husband and an unfaithful wife -- an image played out in the reality of his own marriage to the prostitute Gomer -- primarily in chapters 1-3. Nevertheless, the deep personal insights Hosea offers into the emotional relationship between God and the people of Israel does not cease at that point. Though his message in chapters 4-10 turns to one of judgment against Israel for willful disobedience and arrogant apostasy, the pain this attitude inflicts upon Yahweh is also a part of the prophet's word. As chapter 11 opens, we see why these words forever mark Hosea as the "love prophet" and why these verses constitute a "love chapter." The message of divine judgment now melts into a pool of divine compassion. Yahweh's judging fist unclenches to open out toward the beloved children with the imploring love of a rejected parent. So clearly does Hosea present the breadth of Yahweh's love and the depth of God's commitment in this single chapter that it has been called by some the "John 3:16 of the Old Testament."[5] Hosea now communicates the unquenchable nature of God's love for Israel by shifting to a different metaphor. Instead of representing the relationship between God and Israel as that of husband and wife, Hosea now speaks of the bond between these two as that of Father and child. The image of God as the eternally loving parent and Israel as the headstrong, rebellious and downright disobedient child gives chapter 11 its power. I would now like to offer a few notes. In verses 1-4, Pannenberg[6] notes that the God of Jesus is none other than the God of Jewish faith. The thought of divine fatherhood that we find in II Samuel 7:14 and Psalm 2:7 is one that Hosea will incorporate in his preaching in a figurative way, with alternating features of fatherly and motherly care. Pannenberg[7] also notes that throughout this section we see the electing love of God for the people. In verse 1, the relation between king and vassal is described in same terms.  The initiative is Yahweh's.  See Ex 4:22.  The period is deliverance from Egypt. This text opens with words probably made most familiar to us by their use in Matthew 2:15. The gospel writer could have found no other prophetic text that could communicate parental concern quite so touchingly. Although Matthew's gospel uses Hosea's words to explain Jesus' personal history, the prophet's proclamation in 11:1 is quite clearly a reference to the nation-building exodus event in the life of Israel. Scholars identify the divine testimony that claims, "out of Egypt I called my son" as representative of "election love." The escape from Egypt was steeped in God's parental purpose. The people who would be Israel were already "loved" and "called" to a sovereign purpose from the moment they stepped away from Pharaoh's bondage.  The misbehavior first cited here, however, reveals that from the outset of their relationship, Israel has been a willful, wayward child. In verse 2, the personal pronouns are unclear, making it uncertain whether intends us to read the one "calling" as Yahweh or Yahweh's prophets ("I" vs. "they"). However, the author firmly identifies the direction in which Israel runs -- toward the local gods of the Canaanites, the ba'als. This blatant disobedience against both God's singularity and power does not ignite a divine rage at rejection. Instead, God indulges in a fond recalling of the nurturing care showered on the son "Ephraim" (Israel).            The stanza created by verses 3-4 recounts six different actions that reveal God's unwavering parental love for this "child" Ephraim. Equating the newfound nation of Israel created by the exodus event with an infant, God recalls how the baby became a toddler -- "it was I who taught Ephraim to walk ... " (v.3). Certain vagaries in the text make the next claim unclear. Either God is depicted as guiding the youngster in his first steps -- "taking them by their arms" -- or God is described as giving the toddler a free ride -- "I took them up in my arms." There is scholarly debate over the dangling nature of the next directive "but they did not know that I healed them." Some scholars suggest that a concluding half-line has been lost, a line that would have linked the images of God "taking them up" and God "healing" the youthful Israel.  In verse 4 it is with the cords of compassion and the "bands of love" that Yahweh is at last able to draw the willful Israel near. Yahweh removes ropes from the arms and brings in the joy with chords of love.  Again, textual difficulties lead to various translations in the remainder of this verse. Most translations present the writer's image shifting here from a human comparison to that of a domesticated animal. Accordingly Yahweh is presented as one who "eases the yoke on their jaws," giving them comfort while offering them food to eat. While this has been the most common translation, the NRSV has now adopted an alternative form, one that concludes that the words “on their jaws” were a later addition and thus omits them. Furthermore, this translation interprets the Hebrew yal ("yoke") as yoll ("child"). The resulting verse not only makes sense by keeping the parent-child imagery intact, but also depicts a sweetly tender parental moment: "I was to them like those who lift infants to their cheeks." The righteous judgment of Yahweh reasserts itself as God declares in verses 5-7 that God will return the disobedient Israel to bondage in Egypt and will feel the sting of a harsh new Assyrian master. In verse 5, Hosea accuses Israel of a failure to repent. In verse 6, the sword will finish the strong men of the cities. Nevertheless, Hosea's God cannot leave this matter alone.  What would appear to be a simple case of disobedience and swift divine judgment instead becomes another example of God's unreasonable love and obsessive mercy toward Israel.  In verses 8-9 God's enduring love is expressed in the anguished cry of a parent -- "How can I give you up, Ephraim?" While God did not shrink from destroying the sinful Sodom and her sister cities Admah and Zeboiim, the thought of passing such an unmerciful final judgment on Ephraim causes God's parental heart to "recoil." The tenderness of a parent's love overcomes the dicta of the divine judge on disobedience, and God declares that Israel will yet receive a second chance. Exile and punishment will be only part of Israel's lot. Mercy and restoration will also be received from Yahweh's hand. The divine explanation for this unexpected reprieve, this unmerited mercy, is the Godhood itself: "I am God and no mortal, the Holy One in your midst." God is God. God can do whatever God wants to do. Ephraim's deliverance is possible only through God's divine exercise of pure grace. Pannenberg[8] notes that we see here the mercy of God can interrupt, halt, or turn aside the wrath of God, indicating that wrath is not an attribute of God. In verse 8, suggests the agony in God's mind, searching for a way of evading the response to which God is committed in the covenant curses.  See Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy Dt 28.  Yet, the text still views Yahweh as undecided, even as Hosea has already pronounced judgment oracles.  See 6:4. In verse 9, to what aspect of God's character does Hosea appeal? Hosea apparently appeals to the character of justice, for if God gave special treatment to Ephraim that would be showing partiality.  Note the appeal to God's holiness.  Unlike Amos, Hosea does not pray to allay God's anger.  God reveals the divine compassion in the restoration that takes place after judgment.  Pannenberg[9] says that beyond every threat of judgment the holiness of God also means hope of new and definitive salvation. In spite of human sin God, is faithful to the divine election. Divine holiness finds expression here, the difference between the divine attitude and a human attitude. Yes, God is not like a human being. God does not react like a human being reacts. In verses 10-11, we find the theme of a new exodus. Some scholars think of the passage as an exilic addition. The "love text" closes with a promise that sounds as sweet to Yahweh's ears as it must to the people of Israel. After they have suffered exile, God will deliver them from foreign lands. Called back by a mighty roar, God will gather together God's scattered children and shall travel homeward. Despite all their sins and failures, their loving parent's great joy is -- "I will return them to their homes, says the LORD." Ephraim has surrounded the Lord with lies and deceit, [while Judah still walks with God and is faithful.] Ephraim herds the wind and multiplies falsehood and violence, making a treaty with Assyria and carries oil to Egypt.
Chapter 12:2-14 compresses centuries of history in this one chapter. The comparisons are implied.  Comments on Israel's current disloyalty to God are interspersed with recollections of Jacob's life.  Today, scholars have disagreement over whether Hosea looks favorably or unfavorably upon Jacob.  Hosea does not seem to view Jacob negatively, while he has exposed Israel's "lies." Did Hosea have access to the Genesis traditions?  It certainly does not follow it chronologically.  Genesis portrays Jacob realistically.  Hosea does not give a catalogue of sins.  Nor could one view the narrative as all negative. In verse 2, there were pro-Egyptian and pro-Assyrian parties in both Judah and Israel, and Hosea condemns both. The Lord has an indictment against Judah and will punish Jacob. In the womb, Jacob tried to supplant his brother, Esau (Genesis 25-35). As an adult, he strove with God and the angel and prevailed (Genesis 32:22-32). He met the Lord at Bethel (Genesis 28). However, as the people of Israel today, they are to return to their God, hold fast to love and justice, and wait continually for God. Pannenberg[10] notes the prophet calls the people of God to turn again to its God, a theme that Jesus will continue in his preaching. As the prophet continues, a trader loves to oppress. Ephraim says it is rich while no one can find offense. “I am the Lord your God from the land of Egypt; I will make you live in tents again, as in the days of the appointed festival.” We see a similar refrain in Exodus 15:3 and Amos 4:13, 5:27. The Lord spoke to the prophets, multiplying visions, and bringing destruction. Iniquity is in Gilead. They sacrifice bulls in Gilgal. Jacob fled to Aram and Israel served for a wife. A prophet led Israel up from Egypt and a prophet guarded him. Ephraim has given bitter offense.
Chapter 13 shows the end of Ephraim.  Verse 1-3 can be viewed as a progression from past to present to future.  Ephraim incurred guilt through Baal and died. They keep on sinning, making cast images for themselves. They encouraged others to sacrifice to them. People kissed calves. They shall be like the morning mist or dew that goes away early. Yet, the Lord has been their God ever since Egypt. They know no God but the Lord. Beside the Lord there is no savior. This suggests the Exodus period. Hosea reminds Israel that it gained its identity and character in those formative years. Pannenberg[11] notes that verse 4 means one must take full account of the initially normative function of the history of the beginnings of Israel. The Lord fed them in the wilderness. The Lord fed them to satisfaction. Yet, they had proud hearts and forgot the Lord. The Lord will be like a lion or leopard to them. The Lord will destroy Israel. In verse 10-11, see I Samuel 8 for the view that kingship was forced on people. Where is their king, that the king may save them? Where are all the young rulers? The Lord gave them a king in anger and the Lord took away the king in wrath. The iniquity and sin of Ephraim the Lord is storing up. The pangs of childbirth have come. The Lord wonders if the Lord should ransom them from the power of Sheol, or redeem them from death. “O death, where are your plagues? O Sheol, where is your destruction?” The Lord does not see compassion as a possibility. Samaria shall bear its guilt because it has rebelled against its God. They shall fall by the sword, little ones dashed in pieces, and pregnant women ripped open.
Chapter 14 is a plea for repentance and the assurance of forgiveness. The prophet calls upon Israel to return (repent) to the Lord, for they have stumbled because of their iniquity. Pannenberg[12] notes, the prophet calls the people of God to turn again to its God, a theme that Jesus will continue in his preaching. We find the theme of return, renunciation, and restoration. Yahweh’s forgiveness matches Israel's repentance.  Hosea uses extravagant terms to describe the restoration of the nation.  It is a dialogue between Yahweh and Israel. As the prophet continues, Assyria will not save them, they will not call something they have made their God, and that the orphan will find mercy. This is the final answer to 1:6, the child named No-pity/mercy.  Here, we find an appeal to God's mercy.  The Lord will heal their disloyalty and love them freely, for the anger of the Lord has turned away. The Lord will be like the dew, like the blossom of the lily, and strike root like the forests of Lebanon. They shall live again within the shadow of the Lord. They shall flourish like a garden. What does the Lord have to do with idols? The Lord is the one who answers and looks after them. The Lord is like an evergreen cypress. Their faithfulness comes from the Lord. This promise cancels all the preceding horrors.  Why could Hosea not make positive prophecies?  The final word from God is: "I will love them generously."  Pannenberg[13] notes the electing love of God for the people. The wise understand and discern these things. The prophet concludes offerings advice to the reader.  The prophecy has already become an object of study.  It is in line with the prophecies of the book, though it is intellectual.  There are many typically Hosea words.


[1] Systematic Theology, Volume 2, 333.
[2] Systematic Theology, Volume 2, 239.
[3] Church Dogmatics III.1 [40] 40.
[4] Systematic Theology, Volume 2, 317.
[5] (See The Wesleyan Bible Commentary [Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdman's Publishing Company, 1969], III, 583.) 
[6] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 261.
[7] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 423.
[8] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 439.
[9] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 399.
[10] Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 245.
[11] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 246.
[12] Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 245.
[13] Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 423.